Lincare Inc Pays $239,800 CMP for HIPAA Breach

For the second time in its history, OCR has requested a HIPAA-secured element to pay fines for HIPAA infringement. Lincare Inc. is expected to fund $239,800 for infringement of the HIPAA Privacy Rule which was found amid the examination of a criticism about a rupture of 278 client records.

HIPAA Privacy Rule Infringement Revealed by OCR

Lincare Inc. runs approximately 850 drugstores all through the United States, giving therapeutic gear and respiratory care to patients at its offices. An objection was recorded with OCR about a Lincare representative who left archives holding the PHI of 278 subjects at one of the areas where restorative administrations were given. The examination by OCR affirmed that PHI had been expelled from Lincare offices, presented to a person unapproved to see PHI and that the Lincare worker had relinquished the reports. Moreover, the examination uncovered various HIPAA infringements.

Representatives were regularly expelling PHI from Lincare offices, yet inadequate shields had been set up to keep that information protected. As indicated by the case, Lincare kept up that HIPAA Rules had not been disregarded as the records containing tolerant PHI had been “taken” by the individual who thusly announced the HIPAA infringement. The Administrative Law Judge said no confirmation could be given by Lincare this was the situation. As indicated by the ALJ’s Opinion, Lincare Manager Faith Shaw expelled patients PHI from her office, left it in areas where her better half approached, and after that deserted that information. In the lion’s share of cases, OCR achieves a willful concurrence with securing elements and a contract is signed to determine a HIPAA infringement.

Another Sub-500-Record Penalty Declared by OCR for HIPAA Breaches

In mid-2013, The Hospice of North Idaho consented to a punishment of $50,000 for an information rupture caused by the robbery of a Portable PC the records of 441-client wellbeing records. The fines demonstrate that it isn’t the extent of the break that is the issue, yet the seriousness of the HIPAA infringement that prompted the presentation of ensured wellbeing data.